-
Handwritten notes about and heavily edited typed versions of Ruszkiewicz's proposal for the English Department lecturers
-
John Ruszkiewicz's proposal about the English Department lecturers with handwritten comments from Jim Skaggs
-
Skaggs and Wevill demand more stable employment, fuller membership in, and better treatment by the tenure-track faculty.
-
A memo calling a meeting of the English Department senate where the senate subcommittee's proposal on the English Department lecturers will be deliberated
-
Sue Rodi's alternative proposal for what to do with the English Department lecturers
-
A short note in response to John Ruszkiewicz's proposal for the English Department lecturers
-
A proposal for the English department lecturers, with comments by Lester Faigley
-
A proposal for what to do with the English deparment lecturers, with handwritten comments by Sharon
-
An announcement by Sutherland that Dean King made changes to the proposed English department's governance document, explaining the changes, and attaching the handbook of operating procedures pages to which King refers.
-
A letter from Dean King to Sutherland, Chair of English, explaining that King had reservations about the recently submitted governance document and explaining that he's made changes to bring the document in line with the university's Handbook of Operating Procedures.
-
Primary: Memo from the AGSE about half-time instructors
Attached: Memo from Rebhorn announcing the English Department's plan to hire half-time instructors
-
A memo announcing that Adams's request would be on the agenda for an upcoming FEPC meeting
-
Members Present: Kinneavy, Witte, Ruszkiewicz, Newcomb, Trimble, Cameron, Creel, Byars, Hart
The discussion about textbooks conversation continued from the previous meeting.
The committee also learns that, for legal reasons Sue Rodi's E 306 syllabus is no longer viable, and 306 must be run on skeleton syllabus, which means adopting a textbook, contrary to what Kinneavy and others had wanted
The committee discusses the role of FEPC versus subcommittees.
The committee learns that the fall staffing emergency has been somewhat relieved by having more English faculty teach 306, an additional 71 sections.
-
Unattributed list of desired resources and goals for a new DRC. The writer emphasizes that he or she does not want to hear any more "public decanal criticism of the English Department," and rather desires a clear articulation from the Dean about why the DRC is the best course.
-
An unnamed writer's list of points of difference with three faculty—Slatin, Kinneavy, and Ferreira-Buckley—about the DRC and what it should do. Differences include opinions on the minimum appointment amount for executive committee eligibility, concerns about staffing, and criticism of the English department.
-
A memo calling a meeting to discuss the possible impacts of the new DRC on the English Department graduate program.
-
A memo asking President Livingston to address certain concerns about the DRC, particularly the director's control over faculty appointments within the division . The writer, a mathematics professor, is chair of the Committee of Counsel on Academic Freedom and Responsibility.
-
A memo from Sledd complaining of the English senate subcommittee's decision to recruit lecturers to teach an expected rush of undergraduate writing courses